I'm having cognitive dissonance here. I understand that the trigger for the learner to consume MicroLearning is a need of the worker... but if MicroLearning has no objective, how can it (the need) be targeted? The learner, once being triggered, would then search for a MicroLearning object that fills their knowledge/skill gap. Without an objective, though, how would that object be scoped?
I think I might understand the disconnect. When I think of the value of learning objectives, I think about how we use them as design requirements. What I think I'm hearing you say is that there's no need to include them in the learning object itself (for the learner to read). Am I understanding correctly?
Side note, I am also not a fan of lower cognition objectives, I much prefer them to be performance-based.
Side note, I am also not a fan of lower cognition objectives, I much prefer them to be performance-based.