Ray's last comment in video is, "Help them discover what it is you want them to discover..."
- Appears to me that you want your future Chairs to: 1st, develop a sense of awareness (empathy) around how contestants feel, and audiences perceive the quality of a contest; 2nd, create a sense of urgency around what the rules are as guideposts for everyone to follow, and maintain independent objectivity. 3rd, learning the contest rules and contest decorum.
- The contest rules (in 2nd) are available as background (resource).
- The 1st requires the story based questions, with emotional impact.
My question in all of this approach is the leap between one to two to three.
- Yes, you create a deep emotional experience for "contest objectivity";
- But how much effort is made to actually cover the rules?
- Jonathan's comment below identifies what my challenge is: HOW MUCH " content do we need to push" to accomplish the training objective (of covering the contest rules and decorum)?
- If you do go down the training road of covering the rules (#3), is the suggestion to create a sub-story for each (impt rule covered) and have learners discuss each scenario - followed by the generalization(stating the relevant rule(s))?
- Is this where the chaining begins?